Dye v. Ozmint
Opinion
Anthony Dye appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dye v. Ozmint, No. CA-04-22031-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Anthony DYE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendant—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished