McKinnon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
Harold G. McKinnon appeals the district court’s orders denying relief in his action filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McKinnon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-3516-0 (D.S.C. Mar. 3 & Apr. 6, 2005). We deny McKinnon’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Harold Green MCKINNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; Warden, Estill Federal Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished