Locklear v. Stansberry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Locklear v. Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6255

JIMMY LOCKLEAR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-936)

Submitted: September 30, 2005 Decided: October 21, 2005

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-936 (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished