UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1306

BENNIE JAY EATMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B.D. MORGAN, INCORPORATED; BILLY D. MORGAN, individually; E.L. ROSS, INCORPORATED; MACKIE ROGERS, individually; BILLY ELLINGTON, individually; PHIL HICKS, individually; FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION; JOHN DOE; JANE JANNELL DOE, RN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-02-745-5-BO; CA-02-746-5-BO)

Submitted: October 3, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bennie Jay Eatmon, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin LeVerne Adams, Jr., VALENTINE, ADAMS & LAMAR, L.L.P., Nashville, North Carolina; Derek Morgan Crump, BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Bennie Jay Eatmon appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings and for

summary judgment and dismissing his civil action. He also appeals

the district court’s denial of his subsequent motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Eatmon v. B.D.

Morgan, Inc., No. 5:02-CV-745-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2004);

Eatmon v. B.D. Morgan, Inc., No. 5:02-CV-745-BO(3) (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 12, 2005). We deny Eatmon’s motion to stay. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -