Howell v. Stansberry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Howell v. Stansberry, 152 F. App'x 293 (4th Cir. 2005)

Howell v. Stansberry

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio Lopez Howell, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-119-5-BO (E.D.N.C. *294 Apr. 21, 2005; filed June 9, 2005 & entered June 17, 2005); see also In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000) (discussing circumstances under which § 2241 may be used to test legality of conviction). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Mauricio Lopez HOWELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Low Security Correctional Institution, Butner, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished