Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state *692 a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rouse v. Tennis, No. CA-05-266-2 (E.D.Va. May 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED