United States v. Harbison
United States v. Harbison
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6907
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERBERT KENT HARBISON, a/k/a Skibone, a/k/a Skiborn,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-00-9)
Submitted: October 19, 2005 Decided: November 4, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Kent Harbison, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Herbert Kent Harbison, a federal prisoner, appeals from
the district court’s order denying his motion for credit for time
spent in prior custody pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (2000).
Harbison’s claims challenge the execution of his sentence and
cannot be brought in the first instance to the district court under
§ 3585(b). United States v. Wilson,
503 U.S. 329(1992). Any
challenge to the execution of sentence must be brought under
28 U.S.C. § 2241(2000), after exhaustion of remedies through the
Bureau of Prisons.
Id. at 335. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished