United States v. Harbison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harbison

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HERBERT KENT HARBISON, a/k/a Skibone, a/k/a Skiborn,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-00-9)

Submitted: October 19, 2005 Decided: November 4, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Kent Harbison, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Herbert Kent Harbison, a federal prisoner, appeals from

the district court’s order denying his motion for credit for time

spent in prior custody pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3585

(b) (2000).

Harbison’s claims challenge the execution of his sentence and

cannot be brought in the first instance to the district court under

§ 3585(b). United States v. Wilson,

503 U.S. 329

(1992). Any

challenge to the execution of sentence must be brought under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000), after exhaustion of remedies through the

Bureau of Prisons.

Id. at 335

. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished