Wingfield v. Saraiya

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wingfield v. Saraiya

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7147

ROGER WINGFIELD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR SARAIYA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-03-881-1-CMH)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 31, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Wingfield, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Roger Wingfield appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Wingfield v. Saraiya, No. CA-03-881-1-CMH (E.D. Va. filed June 24,

2005 & entered June 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished