United States v. Scates

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 31, 2005

Opinion

No. 05-7222

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-98-87)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 31, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David M. Scates appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion to Correct Record” pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

36. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Scates, No.

CR-98-87 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

- 2 -