In Re: Bailey v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Re: Bailey v., 147 F. App'x 391 (4th Cir. 2005)

In Re: Bailey v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Claude Bailey petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted, and we therefore deny the petition. We grant Bailey leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his “motion for expedited response” as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Reference

Full Case Name
In Re: James Claude BAILEY, Petitioner
Status
Unpublished