U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

In Re: Bailey v.

In Re: Bailey v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 31, 2005 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Hamilton
147 F. App'x 391

In Re: Bailey v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Claude Bailey petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted, and we therefore deny the petition. We grant Bailey leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his “motion for expedited response” as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.