Davis v. Fahey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 17, 2005

Davis v. Fahey, 154 F. App'x 376 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Darryl McLace Davis appeals the order of the magistrate judge * denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Davis v. Fahey, No. CA-04-607 (E.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000) and Fed.RXiv.P. 73, the parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.

Reference

Full Case Name: Darryl McLace DAVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, Individual and Official Capacity; Gene M. Johnson, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity; Doris L. Ewing, Manager of the Court and Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Unpublished