Al-Rufus Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as frivolous and for failure ‘to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Federated Dep’t Stores, No. CA-04-1138-1-TSE (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2005; entered May 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED