Ronald Dick appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his claim challenging the application of the Windfall Elimination Provision to his Social Security benefits. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion * and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Dick v. Barnhart, No. CA-04-762-WGC (D.Md. Apr. 7, 2005). We deny Dick’s pending motions to “Supplement the Record on Appeal,” “Regarding MSPB Ruling,” to “Consolidate Issues,” and for “Further Ruling.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED