David and Judy Coe appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 3604(b), (f) (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Coe v. Vanderbilt Mortgage & Fin. Inc., No. CA-05-338-1 (M.D.N.C. June 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED