UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6736

DEON D. JENKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; KIRKLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; RECEPTION AND EVALUATION CENTER; L. F. BESSINGER, Warden; KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; OSCAR FAULKENBERRY, Warden; DAVID DUNLAP, Assistant Warden; DERWIN NEASMAN, Major; ALICE FLEMMING, Sergeant; CHARLES MILLER, Captain; JEROME ARMSTRONG; D. MITCHELL; SAMUEL SAINYO; JUDY SULLIVAN; LINDA NELSON; LIEUTENANT SANDERS; BRENDA HICKMAN; BETTY BOWERS; VERNON TUCKER; OFFICER MITCHELL; OFFICER TRUESDALE; OFFICER PARKER; DOCTOR MCKINNEY; SERGEANT JOHNSON; JOANN ADAMS; SERGEANT THOMPSON; OFFICER TRIPPLETE; LIEUTENANT DURANT; OFFICER PATTERSON; OFFICER MAHAFFEY; SERGEANT JONES; OFFICER PAIGE; OFFICER RENNICK; OFFICER UNDERWOOD; DANIEL DUBOSE; OFFICER CLYBURN; OFFICER BOWERS; LIEUTENANT DUBOSE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-1132-HFF)

Submitted: October 24, 2005 Decided: November 21, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deon D. Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Deon D. Jenkins appeals the district court’s order

adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge to

dismiss his complaint filed under

(2000) as

frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Jenkins v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-1132-HFF

(D.S.C. May 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -