In re: Jackson v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 21, 2005

Opinion

No. 05-7258

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-261)

Submitted: October 26, 2005 Decided: November 21, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil Edward Jackson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Cecil Edward Jackson filed a petition for writ of

mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The district court ruled on the

motion by order entered on September 30, 2005. Accordingly, the

mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant

Jackson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition

for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

- 2 -