McGhee v. Stout
McGhee v. Stout
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6498
WILLIAM MCGHEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STOUT, Correctional Officer; WYNN WILLIAMS; ANDERSON, Correctional Officer; FERGUSON, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE, I; JOHN DOE, II; JOHN DOE, III; D. TAYLOR, Correctional Officer; MR. HENSLEY, Hearing Officer; STANLEY YOUNG, Warden; MOSCO WYNN, Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-426-7-JLK)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 2, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William McGhee, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William McGhee appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See McGhee v. Stout, No. CA-03-426-7-JLK (W.D. Va. Jan. 13,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished