Perkins v. Watson
Opinion
Robert L. Perkins appeals the magistrate judge’s * order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the *715 record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Perkins v. Watson, No. CA-04-988-1-RAE (M.D.N.C. June 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert L. PERKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Donald G. WATSON; Estate of Priscilla P. Watson, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished