United States v. Watson
United States v. Watson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7178
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KEITH ALAN WATSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-99-23)
Submitted: November 9, 2005 Decided: November 30, 2005
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Alan Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Keith Alan Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Watson’s motion filed
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), but characterized by the district
court as a successive
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000) motion. This court
previously has reviewed the district court’s dismissal of this
order in its review of Watson’s appeal from the district court’s
dismissal of the underlying § 2555 motion. See United States v.
Watson, No. 04-7455 (4th Cir. Aug. 30, 2005) (unpublished).
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability because Watson
has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right, and we dismiss this appeal as duplicative.
See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished