Thomas v. State of Virginia
Opinion
Eugene Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Virginia, No. CA-05-429-7 (W.D.Va. July 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Eugene THOMAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of VIRGINIA, Defendant—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished