Fulgham v. Delk
Fulgham v. Delk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7235
JOE LEE FULGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JASON DELK, Suffolk Virginia Circuit Court Judge; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE SEXUAL OFFENDER REGISTER, Virginia State Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-05-414)
Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Fulgham v. Delk, No. CA-05-414 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished