Cherry v. Commonwealth of VA
Cherry v. Commonwealth of VA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7225
KARLTON CHERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; CAROL A. SIVERS; MICHAEL M. HAWKS; HERBERT COULTON, Virginia Parole Board Members; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; JIM SISK, Manager, Court and Legal Services of the Virginia Department of Corrections; MRS. BOLDEN, Agent, Court and Legal Services; JACKIE T. WATSON, Administrative Office Specialist III, of the Powhatan Correctional Reception and Classification Center of the Department of Corrections; R. W. HILDE BRAND, Treatment Program Supervisor, Dillwyn Correctional Center; MS. DANIALS, Treatment Counselor, Dillwyn Correctional Center; MS. V. KENNEDY, Treatment Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-05-747-1)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 7, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karlton Cherry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Karlton Cherry appeals the district court’s order
summarily dismissing his action challenging revocation of earned
good time by the Virginia Parole Board. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Cherry v. Virginia,
No. CA-05-747-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 11, 2005 & entered July 14,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished