Cherry v. Commonwealth of VA

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Cherry v. Commonwealth of VA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7225

KARLTON CHERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; CAROL A. SIVERS; MICHAEL M. HAWKS; HERBERT COULTON, Virginia Parole Board Members; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; JIM SISK, Manager, Court and Legal Services of the Virginia Department of Corrections; MRS. BOLDEN, Agent, Court and Legal Services; JACKIE T. WATSON, Administrative Office Specialist III, of the Powhatan Correctional Reception and Classification Center of the Department of Corrections; R. W. HILDE BRAND, Treatment Program Supervisor, Dillwyn Correctional Center; MS. DANIALS, Treatment Counselor, Dillwyn Correctional Center; MS. V. KENNEDY, Treatment Counselor, Augusta Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-05-747-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 7, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karlton Cherry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Karlton Cherry appeals the district court’s order

summarily dismissing his action challenging revocation of earned

good time by the Virginia Parole Board. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Cherry v. Virginia,

No. CA-05-747-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 11, 2005 & entered July 14,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished