U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Lee v. Pittsburgh Plate

Lee v. Pittsburgh Plate
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2005

Lee v. Pittsburgh Plate

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1716

MICHAEL L. LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS, d/b/a PPG, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-4-5)

Submitted: November 21, 2005 Decided: December 12, 2005

Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. John Raymond Merinar, Jr., STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael L. Lee appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination, in violation of the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va. Code § 5-11-1, et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lee v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass, d/b/a PPG, Inc., No. CA-04-4-5 (N.D. W. Va. May 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.