Peamon v. Celotex Asbestos

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Peamon v. Celotex Asbestos

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2077

RICHARD PEAMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CELOTEX ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-1181-WMN)

Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Adam Cossrow, PHELAN, PETTIT & BIEDRZYCKI, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Richard Peamon appeals the district court’s order

administratively closing his case. This Court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order Peamon seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished