Seyoum v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Seyoum v. Gonzales, 161 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2005)

Seyoum v. Gonzales

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Taddese Ayele Seyoum, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying a motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Seyoum, A95-899-567 (B.I.A. Apr. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Reference

Full Case Name
Taddese Ayele SEYOUM, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished