Hawkins v. Hale
Hawkins v. Hale
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7168
MAURICE HAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RUTH HALE, Commonwealth of Virginia Chief Magistrate,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-05-217-GEC-MFU)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Maurice Hawkins appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Hawkins v. Hale, No. CA-05-217-GEC-MFU (W.D.
Va. April 13, 2005, July 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished