Carter v. Stansberry
Opinion
Clester Earlis Carter, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, which challenges the Bureau of Prisons’ computation of good time credits, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-871-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Clester Earlis CARTER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished