Saunders v. City of Petersburg PD

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Saunders v. City of Petersburg PD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2240

EARNESTINE SAUNDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; A. A. MIMMS, Officer; W. B. HINKLE, Officer; J. H. CHABINAK, MPO, and others who’s names have been sealed and unknown to myself and others; CITY OF PETERSBURG; J. K. KUYKENDALL, Officer of Prince George County Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-697-3)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earnestine Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Robert A. Dybing, THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Earnestine J. Saunders seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying her motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b), seeking to reopen her case following the district court’s

adverse grant of summary judgment. We affirm the district court’s

denial of relief. Rule 60(b) may not be used to relitigate claims

already decided by the court, CNF Constructors, Inc. v. Donohoe

Constr. Co.,

57 F.3d 395, 400

(4th Cir. 1995), and Saunders has

raised no new ground to call into question the propriety of the

district court’s decision. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished