Precious Okereke appeals the district court’s August 4, 2005 order denying her “Second Motion for Three-Judge Court,” construed as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Okereke v. Moye, No. CA-05-526 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED