Gist v. Duracell, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gist v. Duracell, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1865

BETTY GIST,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE DURACELL INCORPORATED MANAGED DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columba. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-882-0-JFA)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty Gist, Appellant Pro Se. Bernie Wellington Ellis, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Betty Gist appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her action seeking long term disability benefits under the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Gist v. Duracell Inc. Managed

Disability Plan, No. CA-04-882-0-JFA (D.S.C. filed July 7, 2005 &

entered July 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished