Mary Margaret Daggy appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil action in which she alleged that the defendants conspired to violate her rights to procedural and substantive due process and discriminated against her on account of her age when her job was eliminated. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. See Daggy v. Staunton City Schs., No. CA-04-23-5 (W.D.Va. Dec. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED