Barcus v. Rogers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Barcus v. Rogers, 119 F. App'x 518 (4th Cir. 2005)

Barcus v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Edward Barcus appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barcus v. Rogers, No. CA-04-547-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 24, 2004; entered Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Edward BARCUS v. W.P. ROGERS, Regional Director of V.D.O.'s Division of Operations Alton Baskerville, Warden for Powhatan Correctional Center K.J. Bessett, Warden for Keen Mountain Correctional Center Larry Collins, Inmate Hearings Officer at Powhatan Correctional Center Ms. Galloway, Appointed Treatment Program Supervisor Lieutenant McCallahan, Member of the Institutional Classification Authority B. Morranno Mr. Hammonds, Assigned Counselor for Special Housing Unit, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published