Anderson v. Moats

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 2, 2005

Anderson v. Moats, 120 F. App'x 483 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Phoenix Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and *484find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Moats, No. CA-03-152-1 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Phoenix ANDERSON, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Alan MOATS, Judge Leonard Lucas, Magistrate Howard Ferris, Attorney Jim Shackelford, (Shackelford Bonding) Roger Hickman, (Shackelford Bonding) Carol S. Birdsell, Court Reporter Elaine Bennett, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Taylor County John L. Bord, Prosecutor, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published