Beatty v. Shiloh

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Beatty v. Shiloh, 120 F. App'x 518 (4th Cir. 2005)

Beatty v. Shiloh

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Beatty appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beatty v. Shiloh, No. CA-04-481-WMN (D. Md. June 8, 2004; Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Jerry BEATTY, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Stephen M. SHILOH, General Manager Lawford R. Bell, Operations Manager Robert Beck Unknown Agents and Employees of State Use Industries Unknown Agents and Employees of Maryland Division of Corrections, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published