Mitchell v. Lissi

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 15, 2005

Mitchell v. Lissi, 120 F. App'x 520 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mitchell v. Lissi, No. CA-03-1190-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Jamal MITCHELL, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Vincent B. LISSI, individually, and in his official capacity as an agent or employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigations John C. Bevington, individually, and in his official capacity as an agent or employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published