Ray v. Laureano
Opinion of the Court
Michael Robert Ray seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order of March 5, 2004. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ray seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael Robert RAY v. Iladen LAUREANO Vani Laureno Ernest Southern, a/k/a Buzz Southern Danny Hardee Team Six, Incorporated W. Ryan Hovis John P. Bacot, Jr. William H. Short, Jr. Crossman Communities
- Status
- Published