Williams v. Farrior

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 24, 2005

Williams v. Farrior, 122 F. App'x 65 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Keenan M. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Williams’ action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of *66Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Farrior, No. CA-03-519-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Keenan M. WILLIAMS v. James FARRIOR, personally and in his official capacity Fredy Wheeler, personally and in his official capacity Daryl Hooks, personally and in his official capacity Jeff George, personally and in his official capacity Christina Bargloff, personally and in her official capacity J. Norwood, personally and in his official capacity Joseph Brooks, personally and in his official capacity, Bureau of Prisons, Defendants—Appellees, and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION—PETERSBURG Federal Bureau of Prisons
Status: Published