Moore v. New Hanover County Government

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Moore v. New Hanover County Government, 122 F. App'x 644 (4th Cir. 2005)

Moore v. New Hanover County Government

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Jackson Moore appeals the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”); 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1985 (2000); and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. New Hanover County Gov’t, No. CA-03-195-DEV (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Reference

Full Case Name
Jackson MOORE, Plaintiff—Appellant v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT County Commissioners County Manager Human Relations Commission Carl A. Byrd John Davis Cynthia Stevens, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published