Dye v. Hatfield
Dye v. Hatfield
122 F. App'x 649
Dye v. Hatfield
Opinion of the Court
Rebecca B. Dye and James A. Bailey appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dye v. Hatfield, No. CA-03-1077-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Aug. 26, 2004; entered Aug. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.