U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Berry v. McBride

Berry v. McBride
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 7, 2005 · King, Niemeyer, Williams
122 F. App'x 654

Counsel

James William Berry, Sr., Appellant pro se., Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., West Virginia Division of Corrections, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Berry v. McBride

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

James William Berry, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Berry v. McBride, No. CA-02-856 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.