Newton v. Phillips

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 8, 2005

Newton v. Phillips, 122 F. App'x 677 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Tides Jerry Newton, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Newton v. Phillips, No. CA-02-1230 (WD.Va. Oct. 1, 2004). We deny Newton’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Tides Jerry NEWTON, III, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Sergeant PHILLIPS Counselor Jesse Counselor Duffy Lieutenant Fowler Major Fleming L. Fleming Sergeant O'Quinn C/O Counts Lieutenant Honaker Carl Yates Rick Wiandt, a/k/a Wiandt Warden Braxton Mr. Huffman Central Classification Board R.A. Young, Regional Director Lieutenant Robinson Larry Delp, a/k/a Delp Kenneth Moore, Special Agent Ron Angelone Gene Johnson J. William, Defendants—Appellees, and Sergeant AUSTIN the Office of the Inspector General Grievance Officer Human Rights Activists S. Caudill, a/k/a Mr. Caudill James M. Leslie, Special Agent John 1-3 Does J. Ely B. Edmonds P. Saul
Status: Published