Floyd v. Brown

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 9, 2005

Floyd v. Brown, 122 F. App'x 683 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to vacate the court’s September 24, 2004, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Floyd v. Brown, No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Elizabeth Marie Rushing FLOYD, Plaintiff—Appellant v. David A. BROWN, an individual Robert Potter, an individual Richard Voorhees, an individual Thomas Widman, an individual, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published