U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Hill v. Batts

Hill v. Batts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2005 · Gregory, Hamilton, Widener
124 F. App'x 801

Hill v. Batts

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Yoshea Maurice Hill appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. Batts, No. CA-04-763-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6 & Jan. 24, 2005). We deny *802Hill’s petition for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.