U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Botelho-Perez

United States v. Botelho-Perez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2005 · Michael, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
126 F. App'x 136

United States v. Botelho-Perez

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Botehlo-Perez, No. CR-02-124 (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.