In these seven appeals, Vasu D. Arora appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his actions in which he asserted claims for breach of contract and tortious interference with a contract and enjoining him from filing further actions in the district court pro se without prior permission from the court. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arora v. Indemeel, No. CA-04-30-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Hyder, No. CA-04-31-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Matin, No. CA-04-32-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Fasih, No. CA-04-33-1 (WD.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Husain, No. CA-04-34-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Alemparte, No. CA-04-35-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Tabassum, No. CA-04-36-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2004); see In re March, 988 F.2d 498, 500 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED