U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Thomas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2005 · Michael, Traxler, Widener

137 F. App'x 587

Counsel

Marcellus Thomas, Appellant pro se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Marcellus Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his renewed motion for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Thomas, No. CR-00-233 (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 3 & entered Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.