U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Gregory

United States v. Gregory
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 2005 · Michael, Traxler, Widener
137 F. App'x 605

United States v. Gregory

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Rule 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gregory, No. CR-92-163-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.