U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Carpenter v. Fahey

Carpenter v. Fahey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 4, 2005 · Gregory, King, Shedd
140 F. App'x 503

Counsel

Michael W. Carpenter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Carpenter v. Fahey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Michael W. Carpenter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carpenter v. Fahey, No. CA-04-194-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.