U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Cooley v. Tenet

Cooley v. Tenet
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 2005
141 F. App'x 129

Counsel

Gladys C. Cooley, Appellant pro se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Kevin Jason Mikolashek, Brian Eugene Bentley, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Cooley v. Tenet

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Gladys C. Cooley appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her Freedom of Information Act and employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cooley v. Tenet, No. CA-04-1052-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2005; Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.